The safety fencing is in working condition, over the top of the pool. I noticed that the cover itself looks less than 3-5 years old and likely has 3-5 more years additional or more. I also found the cover had a hard time un rolling closed, and found it to be nearing issue and likely will require service soon ($125+). I would put this cover at a 5 out of 10 on smooth function.

Even though the surface is less than 5 years old there is significant accelerated wear present, but oddly smooth like a new surface with wear grooves and patters typical in a 15-25 year old surface = (surface looks 30+ years old in mineral deposits) due to three factors;

Improper water balance ;

1. very high chlorine
2. likely high ozone
3. high ph / alkalinity / native water elements

I would expect that if all issues mentioned were resolved (ideal balance) the surface should live a long life of approx 10-25+ more additional years without issue, if not 5-15.

The water line tile overall appears to be nominal without any visible issues except for two areas of concern, on in the north west corner, south west corner where some mortar is missing / cracks present = generally this coupled with what appears to be moisture on the outside walls of pool exposed, indicate that water loss may be present and I feel is most likely in this location (Water line area) will need to be re sealed soon ($1-2k) and maybe more.

The chemistry levels are all out of balance except the ph.

The chlorine is V E R Y high, as well as the alkalinity.

The cya is low generally an indicator of water loss / new water but the calcium hardness is also ideal, recommend re testing in 1 - 30 days to help confirm this issue.

I am not opposed to a 0 CYA pool, in fact with a cover its encouraged and most ideal. Additionally this is a special pool with ozone AND salt, I would recommend NOT using salt and ideally consider continuing using Ozone but make sure the MDV vessel is more optimized with its gaseous waste hose. An even better option is a UV light ($800) vs all other options present.

Additionally with what appears to be some algae present on walls ? and cloudiness present all lead me to believe this is not being maintained and could simply be resolved with proper treatments to likely remove contaminants = $300+ ie enzymes, phosphate removals, potential CYA balance if planning to leave un covered for prolonged periods of time, etc.

The skimmer is due to have its float updated and ideally a weighted basket ($100+)

The main drain appears to be VGBA compliant.

The bottom cleaner is in working condition, it is going to need a new tail, and maybe some hose modifications ($105 or less).

The autofill was turned off ? No water pressure. Could not fully test.

Neither light is synced with each other, it is likely a very simple programming issue, recommend service to resolve ($125+).

IF one or the other light is non operational in the future the cost of one of these Jandy Color LED Lights is approx $1100.

The filter is due to be serviced as the pressure is slightly high and indicating its due for its quarterly service ($150+).

The seller told me he saw the suction side union leaking and is due for minor service. At the same time id recommend service to the pump lid o ring and union which may include updating that o ring ($100).

The solar was tested and is in working condition. The structure the solar is sitting on is showing it needs attention ($100-500+).

The timer is in working condition. The antenna on the wireless module is broken, not a large issue, but notable.

The GFCI to the pumps are present.

The Ozone unit is leaking from somewhere inside the main unit, this will likely require some equipment / replacement and service ($125-950+).

Also note the output hose should be ran outside the shed to help prolong the life of the equipment ($50+).

The salt system appears to be functional (due to the extremely high levels of chlorine), and therefore some attention should be applied to the level of output via service ($125+). Note though I would not recommend salt in this application, its un needed and overkill.

The equipment pad is ideal overall, some waterloss seen.

Otherwise without issue other than alot of pool supplies being present inhibiting ideal function / operation of pool equipment ie service.